STATEMENT
I, Martin Mitchell, (YP 97 64 98 C), of 18 Girton Road, Haverhill, Suffolk,
CB9 0JU submit the following statement and compliant:-
I am the unpaid trustee of the ICHOR Trust.
The ICHOR Trust was set up to protect the rights of all people to seek and
share what they believe to be truth, knowledge and wisdom in consideration
of the offer stated below.
ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights) clearly states under article 1
of protocol 1 that individuals have the right to enjoy their possessions.
I have been asked by DC 1424 Jane Stokes if I would attend Parkside Police
Station to be interviewed in relation to an incident on Wednesday 4th May 2005
when a Parking Meter Attendant/Warden of Cambridge City Council Legion Parking
No 15 attempted to give me a parking ticket for non payment of a parking fee
even though a valid receipt for the parking fee in the form of a ticket was
clearly on display on the drivers seat.
To prevent any attempt to place this issue inside any convenient box/remit
without taking into consideration the massive implications of Cambridge City
Council not having the statutory authority neccessary and unavoidable for it
to deploy and enforce Parking meter use in the streets of its locality in the
first place and therefore the incident with the Parking Attendant no 15 of
Legion Parking would not have occured. I prepared this written statement.
When I showed the Parking Attendant the ticket I said whats this "Scots
Mists".
The Parking attendant stated it was not on the windscreen, I said, "So
what the wind may have blown it off as I shut the door!!" The Parking
Attendant claimed both him and his partner looked but, could not find it. I
said, "What
are you on commission or something? Whats your name?" and he said,
"I don't have to give you my name". I replied loudly so as to put him back
in
his place, "I'm
having you, you are a public servant and that makes me your master". I
was not prepared to waist my time dealing with this individual at my own expense
and as I am familiar with beurocratic nonsense and had nothing to write down
his number with I decided to abate the nuisance by borrowing his lapel as I
am entitled to comit a lesser crime in order to prevent a greater one. Therefore,
I abated the nuisance by removing his lapel and driving away so as to avoid
further confrontation. However, as soon as I could that afternoon I telephoned
the Chief Executives Department of Cambridge City Council and advised them
of the above and stated that if I here anymore about this I will invoke the
sanctity of contract to ask by what authority any one can be made to suffer
the forebearance of parking meters AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE. I have done so below.
The Authorities that are responsible for parking meters have not provided
any documentation in support of their right to pollute the environment with
parking meters and or in the alternative any other street clutter, such as
sighns, notices, lines in the streets or indeed anything at all for that matter.
In Ocalan v Turkey 2003 (Application No. 46221/99) the Court reiterated that
under the principle of equality and arms one of the features of a fair trial
is that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his
case under conditions which do not place him under a disadvantage vis a vis
his or her opponent. I am of the opinion that without necessary documents and/or
authorities requested, it will be impossible for Cambridge City Council to
prove it has a mandatory authority that states any person is obliged to suffer
the forbearance of complying with their requests AT HIS OWN EXPENSE.
I am also concerned that the Police may attempt to ignore the fact that Cambridge
City Council has no mandatory authority to place Parking Meters in the streets
in the first place and may attempt to build a case on a void of authority because
it does not wish to sue Cambridge City Council for damages and or in the aLternative
prosecute Cambridge City Council for attempted theft by deception of authority
because it is stealing by way of deception of authority by way of charging
people for parking their vehicles when parking should be free in England because
of every Englishmans Common Law Right to do as he pleases. What that means
is that the Parking Meter Warden/Attendant will not be able to satisfy the
honesty requirements of the Theft Act 1968 s2b for attempting to appropriate
my Common Law Right to do as I please and charge his employer a fee for suffering
the forebearance of being asked to pay fees for parking and or in the alternative
putting the parking ticket where they want it put when both the Parking Meter
Attendant/Warden and his employer have no statutory obligation or authority
to expect my compliance with their illegal parking meter policy in the first
place.
Therefore, the Parking Meter Warden/Attendant will be unable to prove beyond
reasonable doubt that he even has the right to be perfoming what he has been
deceived into thinking is an honest vocation. And if he was acting within the
law the situation would never have occured and therefore it was of his own
making.
Thus, the Parking Meter Warden/Attendant will not be able to comply with the
Theft Act 1968 s2b because he does not have an honest belief in his authority
to insist that I place the parking ticket in the windscreen and thus, he had
no right to be performing that type of work in the first place and, therefore,
all I did was to abate the nuisance with minimum force. Obviously I needed
evidence of the incident taking place and I have it and it will only be returned
after the parking attendant produces the authorities that state I must do as
he claims AT MY OWN EXPENSE.
Further requirement of the provisions of Article 6(1) is the right to be heard,
which includes the right to have the opportunity to present my case and know
the basis of the case presented by the other side, as well as the right to
a fair hearing. The European Court has held that a fair hearing includes giving
reasons for the decision. (Hadjianastassion v Greece (1992) 16 E.H.R.R. 219.
It also includes the concepts of equality of arms and the right against self-
incrimination. I have not been provided with the AT HIS OWN EXPENSE authorities
which should be as clear as they are in the Copyright Act 1920 and until I
am provided with those authorities I shall continue to stand on my right to
see them and each and every attempt to hinder me of my rights will be in consideration
of the below stated offer.
In Watkins V Secretary of State for the home Department and others July 20th
2004, it was stated that ’even in our unwritten constitution the right
of every citizen to have unimpeded access to a Court must rank as a constitutional
right.’ It was also stated that ’damage is not only pecuniary but an
injury imports damage, when a man is thereby hindered of his rights.’
Therefore, I submit that until Cambridge City Council produces a mandatory
authority, not a permissive authority, stating that it must place parking meters
in its locality and an AT HIS OWN EXPENSE authrity in express words of implicit
meaning that take away my right for complying with that Act of Parliament it
will not be able to prove it has an honest belief in its authority to pollute
my environment with Parking Meters AT MY EXPENSE.
Further, I submit that until Cambridge City Council produces a mandatory authority
stating that the parking fee receipt must be placed inside the windscreen AT
HIS OWN EXPENSE all parking meters should be removed and parking should once
again be free for those who have paid taxes due. Otherwise, anybody natural
and or in the alternative corporate would be able to claim they can charge
as much as they like for anything and set up their own little empire of fees,
fines and taxation.
To attempt to ignore the fact that my rights are protected by the ICHOR Trust
Covenant as stated below makes no difference to the fact that this offer is
legally enforceable.
Failure to admit and or in the alternative produce, within 40 days, a strict
and literal authority relied on for each question raised in consideration of
the below stated offer by any individual, root or branch institution of local
or central government, and any other body natural or corporate is acceptance
of the following when those responsible for producing those authorities have
knowledge of the following unilateral, take it or leave it, accept or go without
offer and this will lead to a dominoes affect of accumulating debt requiring
those deceived to sue those who mislead them right back to the source and time
of the original theft by deception of authority :-
THE ICHOR TRUST COVENANT.
OTM 3:1 - 4:6, NTR 21:7 - 22:15.
A NON-NEGOTIABLE UNILATERAL {( ACCEPT OR GO WITHOUT) TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT} EASILY
AVOIDED STANDARD FORM OFFER OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS.
1. My MINIMUM fee for doing or suffering anything I am not legally obliged
to do or suffer at my own expense is until further written notice and with
immediate effect £900,000,000,000,000,000.00p (nine hundred thousand million
million pounds sterling ) plus expenses plus compound interest on the whole
amount due at the rate of 2% per full calendar month without prejudice to my
right to sue for debt at any time without further notice and or in the alternative
without prejudice to my right to sue for damages at any time without further
notice and or in the alternative without prejudice to my right to exercise
recaption at any time without further notice.
2. PAYMENT of the whole amount due must be into the Woolwich plc account of
ICHOR Sort Code 10 - 80 - 04 Account Number 79372187. The whole amount due
must be paid before noon on the fortieth (40th) day after your receipt of this
offer counting the day you receive this offer unless another method of payment
is agreed in writing between the offeree and the trustee of the ICHOR Trust.
3. TO ACCEPT THIS OFFER IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM INCLUDING BY PERFORMANCE OF
CONDUCT WITHOUT NEED OF FURTHER NOTIFICATION IS TO AGREE THAT (A) You have
licensed anything and or in the alternative any person natural or corporate
and or in the alternative any state of being or personality not yet discovered,
even if not yet in existence, to help and assist in any way shape or form each
and every offeror authorized to be an ICHOR Business Angel from now on referred
to as an Angel to use whatever means are available in order for each and every
Angel to remain safe and secure in the pursuit of the truth as due under this
offer and or in the alternative to enter any property in your possession in
order to assist recaption of any property belonging to the ICHOR Trust. (B)
Any none payment of debts due when due instantly transfers title of property,
goods and services and or in the alternative control of property, goods and
services of the offeree up to the value of debts due by that particular offeree
to the ICHOR Trust. (C) Each and every Angel taking action to assist recovery
of property belonging to the ICHOR Trust is entitled to charge the minimum
fee stated at paragraph 1 above and each and every Angel has an equal right
to the benefits of all property vested in the ICHOR Trust. (D) Any attempt
to refuse to accept this offer and or in the alternative any attempt to refuse
to accede to this offer is an attempted theft because it is impossible for
you to CONTINUE to have an honest belief in your authority to make such an
attempt now that you know the only way to avoid accepting and or in the alternative
acceding to this offer is to admit you have no IMPERATIVE words in a primary
statute and or in the alternative a treaty and or in the alternative any other
previous agreement which when given a strict and literal reading entitles you
to claim and or in the alternative obliges you to CONTINUE to appropriate the
property in question unless you show me those authorities before noon on the
fortieth (40th) day after your receipt of this offer counting the day you receive
this offer because you now know that is the only way you can CONTINUE to have
an honest belief in your authority to appropriate the property in question.
(E) The descendants of any Angel whose property is not vested in the ICHOR
Trust within time after acceptance of this offer have an irrevocable right
to pursue debts due to the ICHOR Trust according to this offer. (F) In plain
English, you now know my terms and conditions of business and the terms and
conditions of business of each and every Angel for doing or suffering anything
irrespective of whatever that doing or suffering may be on each and every separate
occasion that you perform an act and or in the alternative omission sufficient
to form a contract and you know that the Trustee of the ICHOR Trust is only
an Angel with Trustee status. (G) If you had any you have now waived all absolute
and qualified privileges and immunities and I may choose the law governing
the contract formed by your acceptance of this offer. (H) Trusteeship of the
ICHOR Trust belongs to the founder trustee until inherited by the next of kin
Angel of the founder Trustee under the obligatory condition that each and every
Trustee must continue to approve the exercise of recaption and enforcement
of each and every debt due irrespective of irrelevant considerations such as
sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national
or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or
any other status of the offeree. (I) If you wish to claim you were misled into
accepting this offer you must do all within your ability to convince each and
every Angel that you were misled into accepting this offer. (J) If two witnesses
and one Angel produce evidence that shows you were beguiled into performing
acceptance of this offer then you may become an Angel and all fees due by you
shall be irrevocably waived for so long as you remain an Angel. (K) This offer
is a gateway to Angel status because if you are refused Angel status your goods
and services and the goods and services of those with whom you associate must
be ignored by each and every Angel because no Angel whatsoever may knowingly
associate with nor buy the goods and services of known deceivers and those
referred to in Revelation 22:15 as without. (L) You will comply with Malachi,
4:3. (M) The passages we refer to in the Holy Bible are those referred to in
the King James version. (N) Pursuing all rights to the highest and most powerful
authority in existence is in the interests of promoting the psychological and
physical welfare of all beings and all their Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
(I will come near to you to judgment; I will be a swift witness... Malachi,
3:5), (it shall leave them neither root nor branch. Malachi, 4:1.), (And ye
shall know the truth, the truth shall make you free. St. John 8:32.), (Great
is truth and mighty above all things. Apocrypha 1 Esdras 4:41.), [Satyam (truthfulness).
Bagavad-gïtä.] (Buddhism leads to enlightenment.), (The Accessions.
These are the believers in truth; they shall have from their lord exalted grades
and
forgiveness and an honorable sustenance. The Holy Quran [8.4].) The founder
of the ICHOR TRUST has seen technology radiating the colours of the rainbow,
that enables the two swift witnesses to determine between victims and deceivers
by joining different dimensions of infinity. (O) Each and every offeree and
those for whom that offeree is liable may be given a state of the art lie and
deception test without further notice or warning and the offeree is duty bound
to notify those affected of this fact as a duty of care. (P) Deceiving subversives,
amongst others, lost status and wealth and power exposed by this the Covenant
preparing the way for ending time and judgment day with the almighty unarguable
truth that fraud unravels everything. (Q) Everything fraudulent in reality
is already unraveled assisted by the messenger of this Covenant saying "COME"
to the Faithful and True we have unraveled the devils work for Angels to simply
take back what is theirs without wasting time and or in the alternative wasting
money and or in the alternative wasting energy seeking a favourable Court Order
to do so. (R) If you think your property has been appropriated contrary to
law you can go to Court and waste your time and or in the alternative your
money and or in the alternative your energy but you will not waste what belongs
to Angels.
4. TO AVOID ACCEPTING THIS OFFER BY PERFORMANCE simply comply, without let
or hindrance, with all rights, duties and obligations owed to the offeror before
noon on the fortieth (40th) day after your receipt of this offer counting the
day you receive this offer.
5. TAKE NOTICE. If you fail to make payment when due the offeror reserves the
right to issue a summons, claim, other process for debt and or in the alternative
damages, as well as the right to exercise recaption without first obtaining
a Court order to do so, without a letter before action and costs will be as
between solicitor (lawyer) and client. END OF OFFER.
Surely, if on the level field of the Common Law everyone has the right to
do as they please and rights are property. Then anyone can charge a fee for
doing or suffering anything they are not obliged in law to do or suffer AT
THEIR OWN EXPENSE.
IT IS NOT LOGICAL TO PROTECT A PUBLIC SERVANT OF ANYKIND IN THE ABSENCE OF
AUTHORITY AND FOR PROFESSIONALS TO CLAIM IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE.
Every Magistrate is duty bound to accept that each and every Citizen has the
right to offer to contract for continuing to go without being shown the authorities
relied on by those purporting to rely on them. Each and every citizen has the
right to know by what authority their property is being appropriated.
A CONSEQUENCE OF THE THEFT ACT 1968 S2(b) IS THAT THOSE WHO HAVE AN HONEST
BELIEF IN AUTHORITY MUST BE ABLE TO PRODUCE IT WITHIN 40 DAYS.
REALITY IS THAT THOSE WHO COMMIT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION WILL BE INCAPABLE OF
PRODUCING AUTHORITIES BECAUSE THEY DO NOT EXIST.
Also, I fail to see how an employee of a Local Authority can have an honest
expectation of anyone to do or suffer anything at HIS OWN EXPENSE unless that
employee can show you words in a primary Act of Parliament stating exactly
what must be done and suffered because in contract law there can be no presumption
of anything unless express words of implicit meaning take away an individuals
right to contract for the affect in question otherwise any one would be able
to charge any gullable person for anything and get away with it and if you
can't prove who was trying to make you do what the guilty person could claim
anything and the innocent victim would be paying for everything instead of
the corrupt paying out of their own pockets as they should according to law.
It is my honest belief that no authority has existed since the 1920 Copyright
Act to authorise anyone to state any Citizen must suffer anything at their
own expense that is why as often as I can I apply the offer stated above.
Professionals must know the whereabouts of authorities they rely on and be
able to show them to those affected. See Metropolitan Asylum District v Hill
1889.
We are all duty bound to protect the sanctity of contract upon which all
global trade depends including our trade of protecting Citizen’s Rights by
application of Contract Law that can only be objected to by criminals with
hidden agendas, directives and policies contrary to Law who can seen how this
exposes their fraud, corruption and theft by deception of authority.
Therefore, in consideration of the ICHOR Trust Covenant and your knowledge
of it as laid before you, I request you honour my right to be shown the exact
words in an Act of Parliament that must be relied on by those purporting to
have AN HONEST BELIEF in their authority to appropriate my Common Law Right
to do as I please with my property, my rights being my property.
Finally, I request that the Police insist the Parking Meter Attendant/Warden
provide the evidence upon which he must rely namely; the AT HIS OWN EXPENSE
authority necessary and unavoidable for him to have me or any other individual
comply with his employers desires at our own expense.
I submit that my defence in this case must be heard under common law, contract
law, the rules of natural justice, article 6 HRA 1998 and the Magna Carta.
Dated this 22nd day of June 2005
Full name: Martin Mitchell
Signed:………………
Home | Law
of contract | The
Covenant | Statements | Letters
to | Letters
from | Links | Contact
Us |
You can contact the trustee at trustee@ichortrust.co.uk or
Aabbex© Computers WebMaster on 0870
803 1720 or click
here
