logo2

I.C.H.O.R. Trust

(I)nfinite (C)ovenant for (H)uman rights, (O)bligations and (R)eparation

logo

 

corner

STATEMENT


I, Martin Mitchell, (YP 97 64 98 C), of 18 Girton Road, Haverhill, Suffolk, CB9 0JU submit the following statement and compliant:-

I am the unpaid trustee of the ICHOR Trust.

The ICHOR Trust was set up to protect the rights of all people to seek and share what they believe to be truth, knowledge and wisdom in consideration of the offer stated below.

ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights) clearly states under article 1 of protocol 1 that individuals have the right to enjoy their possessions.

I have been asked by DC 1424 Jane Stokes if I would attend Parkside Police Station to be interviewed in relation to an incident on Wednesday 4th May 2005 when a Parking Meter Attendant/Warden of Cambridge City Council Legion Parking No 15 attempted to give me a parking ticket for non payment of a parking fee even though a valid receipt for the parking fee in the form of a ticket was clearly on display on the drivers seat.

To prevent any attempt to place this issue inside any convenient box/remit without taking into consideration the massive implications of Cambridge City Council not having the statutory authority neccessary and unavoidable for it to deploy and enforce Parking meter use in the streets of its locality in the first place and therefore the incident with the Parking Attendant no 15 of Legion Parking would not have occured. I prepared this written statement.

When I showed the Parking Attendant the ticket I said whats this "Scots Mists". The Parking attendant stated it was not on the windscreen, I said, "So what the wind may have blown it off as I shut the door!!" The Parking Attendant claimed both him and his partner looked but, could not find it. I said, "What are you on commission or something? Whats your name?" and he said, "I don't have to give you my name". I replied loudly so as to put him back in his place, "I'm having you, you are a public servant and that makes me your master". I was not prepared to waist my time dealing with this individual at my own expense and as I am familiar with beurocratic nonsense and had nothing to write down his number with I decided to abate the nuisance by borrowing his lapel as I am entitled to comit a lesser crime in order to prevent a greater one. Therefore, I abated the nuisance by removing his lapel and driving away so as to avoid further confrontation. However, as soon as I could that afternoon I telephoned the Chief Executives Department of Cambridge City Council and advised them of the above and stated that if I here anymore about this I will invoke the sanctity of contract to ask by what authority any one can be made to suffer the forebearance of parking meters AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE. I have done so below.

The Authorities that are responsible for parking meters have not provided any documentation in support of their right to pollute the environment with parking meters and or in the alternative any other street clutter, such as sighns, notices, lines in the streets or indeed anything at all for that matter.

In Ocalan v Turkey 2003 (Application No. 46221/99) the Court reiterated that under the principle of equality and arms one of the features of a fair trial is that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions which do not place him under a disadvantage vis a vis his or her opponent. I am of the opinion that without necessary documents and/or authorities requested, it will be impossible for Cambridge City Council to prove it has a mandatory authority that states any person is obliged to suffer the forbearance of complying with their requests AT HIS OWN EXPENSE.

I am also concerned that the Police may attempt to ignore the fact that Cambridge City Council has no mandatory authority to place Parking Meters in the streets in the first place and may attempt to build a case on a void of authority because it does not wish to sue Cambridge City Council for damages and or in the aLternative prosecute Cambridge City Council for attempted theft by deception of authority because it is stealing by way of deception of authority by way of charging people for parking their vehicles when parking should be free in England because of every Englishmans Common Law Right to do as he pleases. What that means is that the Parking Meter Warden/Attendant will not be able to satisfy the honesty requirements of the Theft Act 1968 s2b for attempting to appropriate my Common Law Right to do as I please and charge his employer a fee for suffering the forebearance of being asked to pay fees for parking and or in the alternative putting the parking ticket where they want it put when both the Parking Meter Attendant/Warden and his employer have no statutory obligation or authority to expect my compliance with their illegal parking meter policy in the first place.

Therefore, the Parking Meter Warden/Attendant will be unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he even has the right to be perfoming what he has been deceived into thinking is an honest vocation. And if he was acting within the law the situation would never have occured and therefore it was of his own making.

Thus, the Parking Meter Warden/Attendant will not be able to comply with the Theft Act 1968 s2b because he does not have an honest belief in his authority to insist that I place the parking ticket in the windscreen and thus, he had no right to be performing that type of work in the first place and, therefore, all I did was to abate the nuisance with minimum force. Obviously I needed evidence of the incident taking place and I have it and it will only be returned after the parking attendant produces the authorities that state I must do as he claims AT MY OWN EXPENSE.

Further requirement of the provisions of Article 6(1) is the right to be heard, which includes the right to have the opportunity to present my case and know the basis of the case presented by the other side, as well as the right to a fair hearing. The European Court has held that a fair hearing includes giving reasons for the decision. (Hadjianastassion v Greece (1992) 16 E.H.R.R. 219. It also includes the concepts of equality of arms and the right against self- incrimination. I have not been provided with the AT HIS OWN EXPENSE authorities which should be as clear as they are in the Copyright Act 1920 and until I am provided with those authorities I shall continue to stand on my right to see them and each and every attempt to hinder me of my rights will be in consideration of the below stated offer.

In Watkins V Secretary of State for the home Department and others July 20th 2004, it was stated that ’even in our unwritten constitution the right of every citizen to have unimpeded access to a Court must rank as a constitutional right.’ It was also stated that ’damage is not only pecuniary but an injury imports damage, when a man is thereby hindered of his rights.’

Therefore, I submit that until Cambridge City Council produces a mandatory authority, not a permissive authority, stating that it must place parking meters in its locality and an AT HIS OWN EXPENSE authrity in express words of implicit meaning that take away my right for complying with that Act of Parliament it will not be able to prove it has an honest belief in its authority to pollute my environment with Parking Meters AT MY EXPENSE.

Further, I submit that until Cambridge City Council produces a mandatory authority stating that the parking fee receipt must be placed inside the windscreen AT HIS OWN EXPENSE all parking meters should be removed and parking should once again be free for those who have paid taxes due. Otherwise, anybody natural and or in the alternative corporate would be able to claim they can charge as much as they like for anything and set up their own little empire of fees, fines and taxation.

To attempt to ignore the fact that my rights are protected by the ICHOR Trust Covenant as stated below makes no difference to the fact that this offer is legally enforceable.

Failure to admit and or in the alternative produce, within 40 days, a strict and literal authority relied on for each question raised in consideration of the below stated offer by any individual, root or branch institution of local or central government, and any other body natural or corporate is acceptance of the following when those responsible for producing those authorities have knowledge of the following unilateral, take it or leave it, accept or go without offer and this will lead to a dominoes affect of accumulating debt requiring those deceived to sue those who mislead them right back to the source and time of the original theft by deception of authority :-

THE ICHOR TRUST COVENANT.
OTM 3:1 - 4:6, NTR 21:7 - 22:15.
A NON-NEGOTIABLE UNILATERAL {( ACCEPT OR GO WITHOUT) TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT} EASILY AVOIDED STANDARD FORM OFFER OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS.
1. My MINIMUM fee for doing or suffering anything I am not legally obliged to do or suffer at my own expense is until further written notice and with immediate effect £900,000,000,000,000,000.00p (nine hundred thousand million million pounds sterling ) plus expenses plus compound interest on the whole amount due at the rate of 2% per full calendar month without prejudice to my right to sue for debt at any time without further notice and or in the alternative without prejudice to my right to sue for damages at any time without further notice and or in the alternative without prejudice to my right to exercise recaption at any time without further notice.
2. PAYMENT of the whole amount due must be into the Woolwich plc account of ICHOR Sort Code 10 - 80 - 04 Account Number 79372187. The whole amount due must be paid before noon on the fortieth (40th) day after your receipt of this offer counting the day you receive this offer unless another method of payment is agreed in writing between the offeree and the trustee of the ICHOR Trust.
3. TO ACCEPT THIS OFFER IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM INCLUDING BY PERFORMANCE OF CONDUCT WITHOUT NEED OF FURTHER NOTIFICATION IS TO AGREE THAT (A) You have licensed anything and or in the alternative any person natural or corporate and or in the alternative any state of being or personality not yet discovered, even if not yet in existence, to help and assist in any way shape or form each and every offeror authorized to be an ICHOR Business Angel from now on referred to as an Angel to use whatever means are available in order for each and every Angel to remain safe and secure in the pursuit of the truth as due under this offer and or in the alternative to enter any property in your possession in order to assist recaption of any property belonging to the ICHOR Trust. (B) Any none payment of debts due when due instantly transfers title of property, goods and services and or in the alternative control of property, goods and services of the offeree up to the value of debts due by that particular offeree to the ICHOR Trust. (C) Each and every Angel taking action to assist recovery of property belonging to the ICHOR Trust is entitled to charge the minimum fee stated at paragraph 1 above and each and every Angel has an equal right to the benefits of all property vested in the ICHOR Trust. (D) Any attempt to refuse to accept this offer and or in the alternative any attempt to refuse to accede to this offer is an attempted theft because it is impossible for you to CONTINUE to have an honest belief in your authority to make such an attempt now that you know the only way to avoid accepting and or in the alternative acceding to this offer is to admit you have no IMPERATIVE words in a primary statute and or in the alternative a treaty and or in the alternative any other previous agreement which when given a strict and literal reading entitles you to claim and or in the alternative obliges you to CONTINUE to appropriate the property in question unless you show me those authorities before noon on the fortieth (40th) day after your receipt of this offer counting the day you receive this offer because you now know that is the only way you can CONTINUE to have an honest belief in your authority to appropriate the property in question. (E) The descendants of any Angel whose property is not vested in the ICHOR Trust within time after acceptance of this offer have an irrevocable right to pursue debts due to the ICHOR Trust according to this offer. (F) In plain English, you now know my terms and conditions of business and the terms and conditions of business of each and every Angel for doing or suffering anything irrespective of whatever that doing or suffering may be on each and every separate occasion that you perform an act and or in the alternative omission sufficient to form a contract and you know that the Trustee of the ICHOR Trust is only an Angel with Trustee status. (G) If you had any you have now waived all absolute and qualified privileges and immunities and I may choose the law governing the contract formed by your acceptance of this offer. (H) Trusteeship of the ICHOR Trust belongs to the founder trustee until inherited by the next of kin Angel of the founder Trustee under the obligatory condition that each and every Trustee must continue to approve the exercise of recaption and enforcement of each and every debt due irrespective of irrelevant considerations such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or any other status of the offeree. (I) If you wish to claim you were misled into accepting this offer you must do all within your ability to convince each and every Angel that you were misled into accepting this offer. (J) If two witnesses and one Angel produce evidence that shows you were beguiled into performing acceptance of this offer then you may become an Angel and all fees due by you shall be irrevocably waived for so long as you remain an Angel. (K) This offer is a gateway to Angel status because if you are refused Angel status your goods and services and the goods and services of those with whom you associate must be ignored by each and every Angel because no Angel whatsoever may knowingly associate with nor buy the goods and services of known deceivers and those referred to in Revelation 22:15 as without. (L) You will comply with Malachi, 4:3. (M) The passages we refer to in the Holy Bible are those referred to in the King James version. (N) Pursuing all rights to the highest and most powerful authority in existence is in the interests of promoting the psychological and physical welfare of all beings and all their Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (I will come near to you to judgment; I will be a swift witness... Malachi, 3:5), (it shall leave them neither root nor branch. Malachi, 4:1.), (And ye shall know the truth, the truth shall make you free. St. John 8:32.), (Great is truth and mighty above all things. Apocrypha 1 Esdras 4:41.), [Satyam (truthfulness). Bagavad-gïtä.] (Buddhism leads to enlightenment.), (The Accessions. These are the believers in truth; they shall have from their lord exalted grades and forgiveness and an honorable sustenance. The Holy Quran [8.4].) The founder of the ICHOR TRUST has seen technology radiating the colours of the rainbow, that enables the two swift witnesses to determine between victims and deceivers by joining different dimensions of infinity. (O) Each and every offeree and those for whom that offeree is liable may be given a state of the art lie and deception test without further notice or warning and the offeree is duty bound to notify those affected of this fact as a duty of care. (P) Deceiving subversives, amongst others, lost status and wealth and power exposed by this the Covenant preparing the way for ending time and judgment day with the almighty unarguable truth that fraud unravels everything. (Q) Everything fraudulent in reality is already unraveled assisted by the messenger of this Covenant saying "COME" to the Faithful and True we have unraveled the devils work for Angels to simply take back what is theirs without wasting time and or in the alternative wasting money and or in the alternative wasting energy seeking a favourable Court Order to do so. (R) If you think your property has been appropriated contrary to law you can go to Court and waste your time and or in the alternative your money and or in the alternative your energy but you will not waste what belongs to Angels.
4. TO AVOID ACCEPTING THIS OFFER BY PERFORMANCE simply comply, without let or hindrance, with all rights, duties and obligations owed to the offeror before noon on the fortieth (40th) day after your receipt of this offer counting the day you receive this offer.
5. TAKE NOTICE. If you fail to make payment when due the offeror reserves the right to issue a summons, claim, other process for debt and or in the alternative damages, as well as the right to exercise recaption without first obtaining a Court order to do so, without a letter before action and costs will be as between solicitor (lawyer) and client. END OF OFFER.

Surely, if on the level field of the Common Law everyone has the right to do as they please and rights are property. Then anyone can charge a fee for doing or suffering anything they are not obliged in law to do or suffer AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE.

IT IS NOT LOGICAL TO PROTECT A PUBLIC SERVANT OF ANYKIND IN THE ABSENCE OF AUTHORITY AND FOR PROFESSIONALS TO CLAIM IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE.

Every Magistrate is duty bound to accept that each and every Citizen has the right to offer to contract for continuing to go without being shown the authorities relied on by those purporting to rely on them. Each and every citizen has the right to know by what authority their property is being appropriated.

A CONSEQUENCE OF THE THEFT ACT 1968 S2(b) IS THAT THOSE WHO HAVE AN HONEST BELIEF IN AUTHORITY MUST BE ABLE TO PRODUCE IT WITHIN 40 DAYS.

REALITY IS THAT THOSE WHO COMMIT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION WILL BE INCAPABLE OF PRODUCING AUTHORITIES BECAUSE THEY DO NOT EXIST.

Also, I fail to see how an employee of a Local Authority can have an honest expectation of anyone to do or suffer anything at HIS OWN EXPENSE unless that employee can show you words in a primary Act of Parliament stating exactly what must be done and suffered because in contract law there can be no presumption of anything unless express words of implicit meaning take away an individuals right to contract for the affect in question otherwise any one would be able to charge any gullable person for anything and get away with it and if you can't prove who was trying to make you do what the guilty person could claim anything and the innocent victim would be paying for everything instead of the corrupt paying out of their own pockets as they should according to law.

It is my honest belief that no authority has existed since the 1920 Copyright Act to authorise anyone to state any Citizen must suffer anything at their own expense that is why as often as I can I apply the offer stated above.

Professionals must know the whereabouts of authorities they rely on and be able to show them to those affected. See Metropolitan Asylum District v Hill 1889.

We are all duty bound to protect the sanctity of contract upon which all global trade depends including our trade of protecting Citizen’s Rights by application of Contract Law that can only be objected to by criminals with hidden agendas, directives and policies contrary to Law who can seen how this exposes their fraud, corruption and theft by deception of authority.

Therefore, in consideration of the ICHOR Trust Covenant and your knowledge of it as laid before you, I request you honour my right to be shown the exact words in an Act of Parliament that must be relied on by those purporting to have AN HONEST BELIEF in their authority to appropriate my Common Law Right to do as I please with my property, my rights being my property.

Finally, I request that the Police insist the Parking Meter Attendant/Warden provide the evidence upon which he must rely namely; the AT HIS OWN EXPENSE authority necessary and unavoidable for him to have me or any other individual comply with his employers desires at our own expense.

I submit that my defence in this case must be heard under common law, contract law, the rules of natural justice, article 6 HRA 1998 and the Magna Carta.


Dated this 22nd day of June 2005

Full name: Martin Mitchell


Signed:………………

 

Home | Law of contractThe CovenantStatementsLetters to | Letters from | Links | Contact Us |
You can contact the trustee at trustee@ichortrust.co.uk or
Aabbex© Computers WebMaster on 0870 803 1720 or click here

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home | Law of contractThe CovenantStatementsLetters to | Letters from | Links | Contact Us |
You can contact the trustee at trustee@ichortrust.co.uk or
Aabbex© Computers WebMaster on 0870 803 1720 or click here