Back Next Statment's
authority within 40 days as is our right protected under contract as explained
below.
Rights are both Property and Possessions
The ICHOR Trust Covenant is stated below and the ICHOR Trust Covenant
protects my right to charge a fee of £900 thousand million million
(pounds sterling) for each and every breach of my rights on an individual
basis
because my rights
are my tradable property and, therefore, my tradable possessions there
being no legally sustainable argument to the contrary as is shown at
the web site
www.ichortrust.co.uk by various government departments clearly failing
to produce authorities they must in law rely on and, therefore, be
able to produce within
40 days.
The Theft Act 1968 S2b refers to intangible property, and rights are
both property and possessions being stolen from me by the Queen and/or
the person
who intercepted her mail because we have not received a legally sustainable
reply and the judiciary have sworn allegiance to the Queen and now
there is a clear conflict of interest in the judiciaries’ duty of
care to defend the Common Law.
The Office of the Prime Minister and first Lord of the treasury and the Department
for Constitutional Affairs have also failed to give us legally sustainable
replies even though we contract and the High Court has given us obiter dictum
that this is an ingenious application of contract that forces a return to the
basic principles of contract.
Meaningless Summonses.
Evidence of a twist in the law is made clear by use of the phrase “Contrary
to”
The nonsensical wording on Summonses and NIPs could be fundamentally due to
the fact that since Sir John Popham became Lord chancellor, who incidentally
is alleged to have committed highway robbery to finance his legal studies just
as I claim the police are doing in a tyrannical manner by threatening to endorse
my licence with points based on evidence gained in an illegal manner according
to the Theft Act 1968 S2b and my Human rights, amongst other rights, by forcing
me to comply under duress of losing my license and my job due to what is in
reality criminal behaviour of the police and prosecution services who have
no honest belief in their authority because they will not be able to produce
as we have already proved at www.ichortrust.co.uk any authority for changing
the Common Law meaning of contrary to into something that makes sense in a
Summons.
STEALING MONEY FROM ORDINARY PEOPLE TO PAY THE WAGES OF THE CORRUPT.
Sir John Popham, did knowingly and deliberately twist the law in a fundamentally
extreme and corrupt way so as to gain favour of the establishment and capitalists
of the day namely the Elizabethan Crown. Sir John
Back Next Statment's
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
