Back Next Statment's
the Department for Constitutional Affairs which was then called the Lord Chancellors
department and the evidence is on display at www.ichortrust.co.uk and it is a
criminal offence to attempt to defeat a trust.
No one has ever shown any authority that obliges me and or in the alternative
any other beneficiary of the ICHOR Trust, to do or suffer anything
AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE in any Act of Parliament other than the Copyright
Act 1911.
Therefore, I have a Common Law right to use the ICHOR Trust covenant
as published at www.ichortrust.co.uk
and copied below to expose what is in reality theft by deception of
authority and or in the alternative terrorism and or in the alternative
a fraud on
a duty of care as practised by Law Society members, the Crown and Crown
servants, amongst others, who have all inverted their democratic duty of
care contrary
to all Law by operating the law in an illegal and hypocritical way
that gives
capitalists and the class system priority over ordinary peoples’ Common
Law rights. We believe hypocrisy is the source of all terrorism on
both sides of the war on terror and that western societies are controlled
by
terrorists
attempting to maintain the balance of power in favour of a criminal
ruling class and capitalist mentality contrary to law as is exposed
by the ICHOR
Trust at www.ichortrust.co.uk
ALLEGATION OF EXCEEDING PERMITTED SPEED LIMIT.
The Police have not given me any evidence sufficient to demonstrate to this
court that their camera is reliable. The reliability of such a speed camera
needs to be proven by the police because it is the duty of those who claim
the law has been broken to prove their argument beyond reasonable doubt.
The Police have not given me any evidence sufficient to demonstrate to this
court that the highways authority has an honest belief in its authority to
deploy speed cameras and or in the alternative any other street clutter such
as parking meters amongst other things whilst making ordinary people suffer
the forbearance of the pollution of our environment with these capitol and
revenue raising forms of environmental street clutter at our own expense.
There is no evidence to show that the speed they allege can be accurately
measured given no indication of the reliability of the speed measuring device.
Manchester United player, Dwight Yorke, was cleared of speeding on a technicality.
The sidelined striker was accused of driving his Mercedes CL500 at 85mph in
a 70mph zone. Police measured his speed on the A34 in Wilmslow, Cheshire, last
March with a hand held laser gun. His solicitor Nick Freeman told Macclesfield
Magistrates that although the speed gun was Home Office approved, there was
no evidence police had followed some conditions of approval.
'Proscribed device'
Mr. Freeman said: "I argued that whilst the Crown proved the device
had Home Office approval, there was no evidence that the conditions of
approval had been complied with.
"It is a technicality of the law. A measurement made by a proscribed
device is not admissible unless any conditions subject to which approval
is given are
Back Next Statment's
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
