logo2

I.C.H.O.R. Trust

(I)nfinite (C)ovenant for (H)uman rights, (O)bligations and (R)eparation

logo

 

corner

Back    Next    Statment's

6). The Crown Prosecution Service has further failed in their duty to advise me of anything that undermines the Crowns’ case against me by failing to advise me that there is no legally sustainable extrinsic authority for changing the Common Law meaning of contrary to into something that would make sense in a summons because Contrary to does not mean the same thing under Common Law English as According to. This is explained under my heading “House keeping Tort” below.

7). The Police have not provided me with any authority that makes it mandatory for any local authority to deploy safety/speed/traffic cameras.

8). The Police have not provided me we with any authority that makes it mandatory for me to supply the details they requested on their Notice of Intended Prosecution AT MY OWN EXPENSE contrary to laws on slavery and thus contrary to my offer of terms and conditions of business as notified to the Prime Minister and First Lord of the treasury’s Office and the Queen in order to tie in each and every head of state and the subordinate offices, institutions and organisations that they head under the law of vicarious liability.

9). The Home Office has failed to give a legally sustainable reply to the ICHOR Trust in breach of contract law and as it is a criminal offence to attempt to defeat a trust, therefore, there is no legally sustainable reason as to why I should comply with the requests of the police who have vicarious liability for the duties and obligations of the Home Office that is indebted to the ICHOR Trust and me and all other beneficiaries of the ICHOR Trust vicariously for my fee due according to my tradable rights because I have not received a legally sustainable reply to letters I have contracted around to protect my right to a legally sustainable reply. See www.ichortrust.co.uk for evidence of what I claim is the Home Office and other government and members of parliament attempting theft by deception of authority by failing to give the trustee legally sustainable replies to letters sent to and received and acknowledged by them.

10). The Police have not provided me with any evidence of their authority for changing the Common Law meaning of contrary to into something that would make sense in a Summons. By that I mean if I am summonsed for having done something contrary to that which follows contrary to and what follows contrary to is illegal then strictly speaking the summons is an inverted nonsense because if I have done something allegedly illegal it would be illegal according to whatever follows according to and not contrary to what follows contrary to.

11). The Police do not have an honest belief that the local Highways authority has a mandatory obligation to deploy speed/safety/traffic

Back    Next    Statment's

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home | Law of contractThe CovenantStatementsLetters to | Letters from | Links | Contact Us |
You can contact the trustee at trustee@ichortrust.co.uk or
Aabbex© Computers WebMaster on 0870 803 1720 or click here