Back Next Statment's
House Keeping or Corruption.
Is it a knowing and deliberate fraud on a duty of care by a deception of authority
to change the Common Law meaning of contrary to into according to without authority?
There are some house keeping issues that need addressing in relation to the
wording on Summons and Notices of Intended Prosecution in order to prevent
what may be a mistake becoming a knowing and deliberate twist in the law designed
to support an ancient historical view of the Crown as head of state that if
now held within a Democracy may lead to an illegal and criminal inversion of
the Law by the corrupt turned terrorists attempting to retain unjust enrichment
and power contrary to the Sovereign and tradable rights of people in Democracies.
As the trustee has spoken to the DCA (Department For Constitutional Affairs)
about this contrary to nonsense it is now becoming clear that the Crown
Prosecution Service will find it impossible to produce any authority for
changing the
Common Law meaning of contrary to into something that would make sense
in an NIP or
Summons because we have a perfectly adequate phrase namely; “According
to”. If the Crown Prosecution Service cannot prove its authority
for changing the common law meaning of contrary to into something that
would
make sense in a summons then it too is guilty of theft of our Common Law
right to
have words given their Common Law English meaning which means the Crown
Prosecution Service is pretending to have authority it does not have. Because,
pretence
in this context is deception then the Crown Prosecution Service will also
be guilty of a fraud on a duty of care because they really do not care
if they
talk nonsense and recklessly continue to allow people accused of allegations
to make pleadings of innocent or guilty when in reality the wording on
Summonses puts juries, judges and the accused in an extremely and fundamentally
impossibly
expensive situation to rectify other than by quashing all convictions and
starting again and the corrupt must be forced to pay for their corruption
out of their
own pockets.
Back Next Statment's
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
