Back Next Statment's
In relation to the contrary to words that make a nonsense of the wording on the
purported summonses I have received I would like to refer the Court to the quotes
in the well-known book on contract law - Chitty on contract states under special
meaning of words and I quote:”It has already been stated that
words must be understood in their plain and ordinary sense. In those cases where
they are
to be understood in a special sense extrinsic evidence is admissible to prove
the special sense. Thus evidence may be called to explain technical terms of
science or art, to explain contemporary meanings of words of an ancient document
and to translate a document in a foreign language. Extrinsic evidence is also
admissible to show that words have by custom or usage a peculiar sense.” End
of quote. Therefore, any plea of guilty or not guilty must in reality mean the
opposite of whatever one states because pleading guilty or not guilty to having
acted contrary to what follows contrary to inverts what one actually states.
Therefore, I hereby request the Crown Prosecution Service and the Police
to show me the evidence they rely on for changing the Common Law meaning of
contrary to into something that would make logical sense in a Summons and I
will only go without being shown that authority in consideration of the ICHOR
Trust Covenant.
Therefore, in consideration of the ICHOR Trust Covenant and your knowledge
of it as laid before this Court, I request this Court honours my contractual
right to be shown the exact words in an Act of Parliament that must be relied
on by those purporting to have AN HONEST BELIEF in their authority to appropriate
a Defendants right to insist on the Common Law meaning of words and phrases.
If members of the Court think I may not contract with the Court then Please
show me the authority you rely on.
Because peoples rights are their property protected by law from serious
damage by terrorists and other criminals therefore only a criminal would
object to
a person requesting to be shown authority a citizen has a right to be shown
after a Citizen has been invited to attend Court by the present wording of
NIP’s and Summonses. Therefore, we will assume unless the Court shows
us authority to the contrary that those who cannot either produce their authorities
or do not admit they do not exist within 40 days from today shall then be indebted
to the ICHOR Trust in accordance with the ICHOR Trust Covenant and that we
shall remain within the law in exercising recaption of our property in any
way we see fit.
The ICHOR Trust Covenant paragraph 3 subparagraph (O) having been accepted
by performance by the PM and the Queen makes lie detectors and deception technology
now part of UK Law even without the targets consent.
Finally, without prejudice to the above I request that this matter be thrown
out or the hearing adjourned for the Court to await the decision of the ECHR
case of Francis v UK Government heard on 27 September 2006 as well as for the
Police to provide all the evidence upon which they must rely in relation to
all
Back Next Statment's
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
